Last month we looked at Organizational Values and Leadership Modeling in the featured article of our monthly newsletter. If you didn't get a chance to look at that installment, we have a link to connect you here; http://aprioritylearning.com/articles/bptw_organizational_values.php.
Last month's article was the first in a five part series to introduce you to the things learned from The Best Places to Work surveys that various States and private survey companies conduct for businesses each year. The winners of these awards each year are celebrated, published and benefit from the honor they receive in many ways including pride, morale, increased profitability and higher retention. Our work with some of these companies and the research we have conducted over the years brought us to the conclusion that you could do some work in your organization that would make it one of these preferred places. The five categories we identified were:
This month we examine Getting Things Done via Communications and Inclusion. It was clear to us that when employees believe senior managers and leadership at all levels have a good grip on the execution of the business, they sleep better at night. This implies that these leaders know what it takes to succeed, who the competitors are, and what we need to do to win against those competitors. Additionally, these leaders need to include people at the proper levels and communicate with each individual regarding what they can do to make the organization nimble, secure and successful. When these things are done well, the organization can mobilize its workforce in a way that gives it a significant edge in the marketplace.
Create an Open-Systems Approach - An open-systems approach is one that includes people whenever possible in the decisions, conclusions, and strategies of the organization. These can be called steering groups, task forces, focus groups or any number of other titles. They all have the same goal to include the workforce in the decisions and execution of processes, products, and issues important to the organization. The open system takes time and it can be a bit awkward. The skills to conduct an open-systems meeting are very different. Selecting and caring for members become critical.
The advantages of an open system are numerous. We know that participation in the workplace is one of the leading motivators for people everywhere. People in the open-systems approach learn about the organization and what it takes to be successful in the marketplace. They become better team players and share the product of their open-systems work with others gaining critical support. In other words, they gain ownership for decisions and initiatives with an open approach.
The Enemy: The enemy of this category is the belief that people inside the organization don't know enough to help, don't care enough to be motivated and can't be trusted to do the right thing. In contrast to an open system is a closed system. In this system we leave these decisions, conclusions, and strategies to a few select deciders. The obvious advantages of a closed system are tighter controls on decisions, less chance for bad decisions, and speed. The closed system can take minutes when it takes hours to implement a good open-systems approach.
Prioritize Routine Communications Meetings - Polls suggest that people repeatedly say they want more information from their bosses, from each other, and to know about the world around them. This is mirrored in our need to watch the evening news in spite of the bevy of bad news. We are hungry for information and things to learn and, if information is not provided, people invent their own means of getting information. This can be done at the water cooler talk (the rumor mill) or through hearing it through the grapevine. In essence, if we don't fill the void of communicating information, people will find a way to fill the void.
Working at telling employees everything you know about the business, sharing good news, discussing threats, and giving positive feedback inevitably results in higher levels of innovation, trust, and curiosity.
The Enemy: The enemy of routine communication is the belief that to keep information from people will save them stress or that they cannot handle news. It will save stress short term but when they find out... In that same regard, NBC, CBS, ABC and FOX don’t seem to think that there is anything people can't handle. They are right.
Participative Understanding - In extremes participation can paralyze an organization or, on the other side of that, people can feel completely looped out. Many times people take on the task of involvement and don't understand what to do or how to handle the involvement responsibility as a facilitator or leader. The result can be disappointing and discouraging. The resulting water cooler talk can create a ground swell of negative feelings about the participative process and hamper future efforts. On the other hand, if it is handled well, it can be part of the ingrained fabric of an organization. See the example called, One Good Way to Include Employees. Understanding how to include your people makes the idea of participation a way of life. Some really quick ideas follow:
Next month we will take a hard look at Leadership through people listening and success and again give you our very best ideas. If you have ideas of your own, please send them along. We will include them in the article.
In the 20 years since starting Priority Learning, Ralph has facilitated countless learning experiences and has conducted training for thousands of managers and leaders. With over 30 years of leadership development and organizational development background and work, Ralph continues to build relationships with client companies all over the U.S.